On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 17:40 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Heh, this has been a pretty long review period. To be honest I really > would like to get this just out of my hands :) And we do have a need for > this. When are you planning to implement that generic framework? Soon (TM). We need it, so really, I should do it soon. > What I understood is that this is already pretty close what you are > planning. Instead of creating a debugfs file of our own and allocating a > vmalloc buffer (which we do now), we would just use the buffer provided > by cfg80211 (or whatever component that would be) and use the sysfs file > the framework provides. So hopefully it would be pretty easy to convert > this to use your framework. I'm thinking now that since vmalloc space is limited on some architectures, we should just have a list of pages, but of course we could copy it there from vmalloc area. Anyway, yes, it should be fairly simple to convert - but is it worth it for you to have it now? Depends how you use it, I guess. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
