Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 08/01/2014 08:06 AM, Miguel Oliveira wrote:
>> Fix sparse warning:
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_efuse.c:579:5: warning: symbol
>> efuse_GetCurrentSize23a' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Oliveira <cmroliv@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_efuse.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_efuse.h
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_efuse.h
>> index 07bdc34..304cc71 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_efuse.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_efuse.h
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct pg_pkt_struct {
>> /*------------------------Export global
>> variable----------------------------*/
>>
>> u16 efuse_GetMaxSize23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter);
>> +int efuse_GetCurrentSize23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u16 *size);
>> int rtw_efuse_access23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u8 bRead, u16
>> start_addr, u16 cnts, u8 *data);
>> int rtw_efuse_map_read23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u16 addr,
>> u16 cnts, u8 *data);
>> u8 rtw_efuse_map_write(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u16 addr, u16
>> cnts, u8 *data);
>
> NACK. Whenever Sparse issues this warning, you should first check to see if it
> can be made static. Adding it to a header to make the Sparse warning go away is
> not correct unless some other routine needs it to be globally known. In this
> case, no other routine needs it.
>
> Of course, making it static will lead to the compilation warning that the
> routine is not used. The correct patch is to delete the entire routine as it is
> never called.
Yep, fix it correctly, or don't bother!
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
