Search Linux Wireless

Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 1/5] mac80211: allows driver to request a Phase 2 key

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  > You need only one unicast key for pairwise key.  4 keys are used only
>  > for static WEP key.
>  > For pairwise/dynamic WEP and TKIP you use key index in the packet but
>  > it changes only when supplicant change the key it self. You don't have
>  > the key alive in driver.
>
>  No, that's not true, due to rekeying concerns you actually can have more
>  than one group key at the same time in the driver/hardware.

I wasn't aware of this race in rekeying. I will investigate this.
Anyhow rekeying can also happing also for unicast keys.

>
>  > BSS defines security setting which  defined by key management for
>  > pairwise and group key + cipher method for both .
>  > You can run multiple SSIDs over single single BSSID. This is done
>  > using VLANs
>
>  Actually, we don't support that in mac80211.
Last time I worked on AP project it worked. It was older mac hopefully
it's not totally broken

 And the way I understand
>  VLANs they are simply done by negotiating different group keys with
>  different groups of stations each forming a VLAN.

We are saying the same. That's okay.

>
>  > So you can maintain multiple security settings in for one
>  > AP.  However this is not possible when using static WEP since the key
>  > is global and the key is not attached to any address.
>  >
>  > There are more details into it I'm sorry if I'm not 100 clear here.
>  > The bottom line is that you don't need more 4 WEP keys both in AP and
>  > station mod. Same you need to maintain only one pairwise key for
>  > station both in AP and STA mode. In AP mode you need to maintain also
>  > one group key for each station because of the case of multiple SSIDs.
>
>  Except the group keys don't really matter for an AP since they're TX
>  only, which is why we add them with a zeroed MAC address and can only
>  select them for TX
.
Zero address again :)

>
>
>  > Nop. Still you  can have <WEP, WEP>  for <pairwise,group key> valid
>  > setting - This is not static key. The two keys may differ. Under your
>  > assumption the group key will override pairwise key
>
>  Hm, ok. So I suppose the only way to determine "static" right now would
>  be to check that no pairwise keys are configured at all.

I'm not sure if I follow here but I think the simples way to determine
if static key is set is to set static_key flag to 1. I don't see any
reason this can be directly detected from the configuration.

Tomas

>  johannes
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux