On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:28 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > Having csa counters part of beacon and probe_resp > structures makes it easier to get rid of possible > reaces between setting a beacon and updating > counters on SMP systems by guaranteeing counters > are always consistent against given beacon struct. This makes a lot of sense. > static int ieee80211_assign_beacon(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > - struct cfg80211_beacon_data *params) > + struct cfg80211_beacon_data *params, > + const u16 *csa_counter_offset_beacon, > + int n_csa_counter_offset_beacon, > + const u16 *csa_counter_offset_presp, > + int n_csa_counter_offset_presp, > + u8 csa_count) But that seems overkill. Maybe those CSA-related arguments could be in some new struct so you don't have to pass "..., NULL, 0, NULL, 0, 0"? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
