On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 16:10 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote: > > Oh, I get it, you're thinking that there might be a situation where > > those vif types are maybe not supported with different channels? > > > > But in your example you're going from this situation: > > > > chanctx1: vif1, vif2 > > > > to > > > > chanctx2: vif1 > > chanctx3: vif2 > > > > > > The intermediate step that I proposed would give you > > > > chanctx1: vif1 > > chanctx3: vif2 > > > > Which isn't really any different? > > It could be different if the channel in chanctx1 requires radar and > chanctx2 doesn't, couldn't it? Yeah, I guess that'd be a counter-example... johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
