On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 12:38 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > I was actually thinking of just providing the bare minimum to fulfill > requirements for the CSA case: int foo(*hw, **vifs, n_vifs, *oldctx, > *newctx, flags). > > Having an array of transactions passed through a single call seems > more robust and cleaner. Naiive drivers might just iterate over each > entry while more complex drivers might examine the whole request and > detect chanctx swapping. Not sure what you mean by "detect chanctx swapping" - the flags would indicate that anyway, no? In any case, I like this better than a more general transaction API I think, it's easier for the driver implementation and clearer as to what needs to be done/supported. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
