> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 09:22 +0300, Ilan Peer wrote:
> > At some locations, channels 149-165 are considered a single bundle,
> > while at some other locations, e.g., Indonesia, channels
> > 149-161 are considered a single bundle, while channel 165 belongs to a
> > different bundle. This means that:
> >
> > 1. A station interface connection to an AP on channel 165 allows
> > the instantiation of a P2P GO on channels 149-165.
> > 2. A station interface connection to an AP on channels 149-161
> > does NOT allow the instantiation of a P2P GO on channel 165.
> >
> > Fix this.
>
> I'll apply this, but I'm not a big fan of it. Please work with Luis to get some
> information into the regulatory database.
>
Sure. Luis, how would like me to address this?
> Luis pointed this out originally [1] when you were adding the UNII-1/2/3
> things to the kernel that he didn't think they'd be universally applicable, but
> you said they were ... I guess Luis also thought it was true though, and it
> doesn't seem to be (which seems to be because of the 80MHz thing with
> channel 165 I guess)
>
Sorry for this. At the time I was under the understanding that these were universally true.
Regards,
Ilan.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
