On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 09:22 +0300, Ilan Peer wrote: > At some locations, channels 149-165 are considered a single > bundle, while at some other locations, e.g., Indonesia, channels > 149-161 are considered a single bundle, while channel 165 belongs > to a different bundle. This means that: > > 1. A station interface connection to an AP on channel 165 allows > the instantiation of a P2P GO on channels 149-165. > 2. A station interface connection to an AP on channels 149-161 > does NOT allow the instantiation of a P2P GO on channel 165. > > Fix this. I'll apply this, but I'm not a big fan of it. Please work with Luis to get some information into the regulatory database. Luis pointed this out originally [1] when you were adding the UNII-1/2/3 things to the kernel that he didn't think they'd be universally applicable, but you said they were ... I guess Luis also thought it was true though, and it doesn't seem to be (which seems to be because of the 80MHz thing with channel 165 I guess) johannes [1] http://mid.gmane.org/CAB=NE6VQXQPRK9_Q-Nh+ripRa +PdCd=4_EZvPxeghBjc32ejyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
