Friday, April 11, 2014, 10:13:46 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 22:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> I would first like to know if Johannes likes this solution or not. > Heh, I guess that's only fair. >> With previous patches from Luis they were blocked after testing and debugging, so let him >> first speak out if he likes the approach or not. > I think this looks fine. My main complaint with Luis's patches (besides > reportedly breaking some other use cases) was that he was piggy-backing > on some completely unrelated thing to try to recover something. Here we > have an explicit delayed work struct so that seems fine. > And I really like the part where Janusz moves the delayed_work setting > where it belongs - the CRDA call function :) Ok i will duplicate the testing tomorrow somewhat more careful and report back tomorrow. > johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
