On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 22:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > I would first like to know if Johannes likes this solution or not. Heh, I guess that's only fair. > With previous patches from Luis they were blocked after testing and debugging, so let him > first speak out if he likes the approach or not. I think this looks fine. My main complaint with Luis's patches (besides reportedly breaking some other use cases) was that he was piggy-backing on some completely unrelated thing to try to recover something. Here we have an explicit delayed work struct so that seems fine. And I really like the part where Janusz moves the delayed_work setting where it belongs - the CRDA call function :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
