On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 13:02 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > If chandef had non-HT width it was possible for > radar_enabled update to not be propagated properly > through drv_config(). This happened because > ieee80211_hw_conf_chan() would never see different > local->hw.conf.chandef and local->_oper_chandef. > > This wasn't a problem with HT chandefs because > _oper_chandef width is reset to non-HT in > ieee80211_free_chanctx() making > ieee80211_hw_conf_chan() to kick in. > > This problem led (at least) ath10k to not start > CAC if prior CAC was cancelled and both CACs were > requested for identical non-HT chandefs. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/mac80211/chan.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/chan.c b/net/mac80211/chan.c > index 122033d..b472daa 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/chan.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/chan.c > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ ieee80211_new_chanctx(struct ieee80211_local *local, > > if (!local->use_chanctx) { > local->_oper_chandef = *chandef; > - ieee80211_hw_config(local, 0); > + ieee80211_hw_config(local, IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_CHANNEL); I'm not convinced that this is the right way to do this - couldn't ieee80211_hw_conf_chan() detect the radar detection requirement change? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html