On 28 March 2014 14:11, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 14:47 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: >> It doesn't make much sense to store refcount in >> the chanctx structure. One still needs to hold >> chanctx_mtx to get the value safely. Besides, >> refcount isn't on performance critical paths. >> >> This will make implementing chanctx reservation >> refcounting a little easier. > > Why bother with patch 11 then? I try to do one-thing-at-a-time. 11 is a fix, 12 is an enhancement. I can squash it if you want? Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
