On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 14:47 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: > It doesn't make much sense to store refcount in > the chanctx structure. One still needs to hold > chanctx_mtx to get the value safely. Besides, > refcount isn't on performance critical paths. > > This will make implementing chanctx reservation > refcounting a little easier. Why bother with patch 11 then? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
