On 25 March 2014 16:14, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/25/2014 12:27 AM, Michal Kazior wrote: >> >> On 24 March 2014 17:50, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/24/2014 04:21 AM, Michal Kazior wrote: >>>> >>>> On 24 March 2014 12:12, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> - status = ath10k_htc_send(htc, ATH10K_HTC_EP_0, skb); >>>>>> + status = ath10k_htc_send(htc, ATH10K_HTC_EP_0, skb, __LINE__); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Using line numbers in debug messages is very cumbersome. Some people >>>>> cherry pick patches, have their own changes and whatnot which will make >>>>> it more difficult to read the debug logs. Isn't there any better way to >>>>> do this? >>>> >>>> >>>> I would prefer to explicitly wait for tx credit replenishment in >>>> ath10k_wmi_cmd_send() after a command is sent instead of all these >>>> prints. This way you can get a full call trace if it times out. >>> >>> >>> Would that be a performance problem (by effectively allowing only a >>> single >>> item to be sent to the firmware at any given time?) >> >> >> The only thing that may suffer here is wmi mgmt tx but I wouldn't >> consider that performance critical. > > > In that case, why use credits at all? Excellent question. Firmware provides 2 HTC tx credits for WMI. I guess this is on purpose. I imagine WMI mgmt tx can hang (i.e. not replenish tx credits). In that case the remaining tx credit could be used to try recovering, e.g. down/stop vdev (I think it should drop all pending tx and thus free the stuck HTC tx credit). It might be a good idea to keep this recovery strategy in mind when implementing the "wait for tx replenishment" wmi tx blocking. Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html