On 24 March 2014 11:06, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Introduce rx_status htt template instead of >> stack version. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx> > > Why? What's the benefit from doing this? > This is the must in case we would like to report rssi + rates correctly. I describe this in 2/2 - maybe squash them? Currently during heavy traffic we could have: > 10 packets with START_VALID - correct RSSI + rates > 10 packets with END_VALID > 10 packets with START_VALID - correct RSSI + rates > 10 packets with END_VALID - ... Because of that we have to store rssi + rates for case when END_VALID only. In other case when using monitor we will see: - 10 packets with correct rssi/rates - 10 packets with rssi=-95/rate=6Mbps BR Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
