Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 2/3] cfg80211: fix processing world regdomain when non modular

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Janusz Dziedzic
<janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2014-03-15 2:03 GMT+01:00 Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Colleen T <colleen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I'm on mac80211-next/master, sha is
>>> 5a970df8990d173e7e4092952f2e3da1de69b27d
>>
>> I tried to reproduce by just merging the fixes in question onto Linus'
>> tree and using radios=3 but no go. Can you provide the full kernel
>> log, I'm particularly interested in what happened before. The
>> COUNTRY=US on debian, which I believe you're on, should just trigger a
>> regulatory domain setting to US upon initialization. Depending on how
>> Debian does it this could either trigger as a module parameter or as a
>> userspace event *after* the world regdom get set.
>>
>> The radios=3 alone would not do anything other than add new radios so
>> I see no contention on the last_request by increasing or decreasing
>> that. last_request is also protected by rtnl and although I was
>> considering a possible race against processing the same last_request
>> twice if you see how we call reg_process_pending_hints() on reg_todo()
>> its protected by rtnl_lock() so I'm a bit puzzled as to how this is
>> being triggered as those operations should be atomic. The other corner
>> case I thought of was that for userspace requests which sets a
>> timeout, but our when the timeout hits we also rtnl_lock() under
>> reg_timeout_work().
>>
>> The other corner I thought of was when we reset_regdomains() but all
>> callers are rtnl_lock()'d. This is also the same for callers of
>> set_regdom().
>>
>> Do you get different results if you reduce the number of radios? If so
>> where's the trigger point?
>>
>
> Just guessing, try add this one if not included in mac80211-next yet.
>
> [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: regulatory, reset regdomain in case of error -
> this goes to 3.14 directly.

Thanks for poingint that out Janusz, that patch is not in
mac80211-next. Colleen it'd be curious if that fixes your issue but I
don't see how given that I don't see how your situation would hit the
error case. It is certainly worth trying. In any case please do
provide the full kernel log and please try the other things I
mentioned, the more detail the better.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux