On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 15:13 +0100, Thomas Hühn wrote: > > At least temporary flags don't suffer from the 'getting lost' problem as > > in the first patch. > > > > I'll also note that this flag is treated wrongly in software retry > > scenarios anyway, but it won’t really matter I guess. > > Do you mean the case when fragments after the first one get retransmitted by software ? Yeah, something about those cases is fishy ... but it doesn't matter much for your patch. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
