> On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 13:05 +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> > Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > > In the CSA case the BSS is still used, we modify the BSS entry in
> > > ieee80211_ibss_finish_csa() (which is not really clean, but done by
> > > all the current CSA code).
> > >
> > > Since the BSS is changed and the node continues to beacon, I think
> > > that's ok to do it like Sujith proposed.
> >
> > I think Johannes is right. If a station receives a CSA and is unable to
> > switch to the new channel, it leaves the IBSS network. In this case we
> > don't need to keep the BSS entry around, since we proceed to scan again.
>
> Hah, I wasn't paying attention ... yeah I think you're right, it's the
> *failure* case, in which we shouldn't care any more. Simon, you were
> thinking of the successful case, but that doesn't call disconnect ...
Oh yes, I was just thinking, not reading. You are right, of course! Thanks for
correcting me. :)
I see Sujith has already posted v2, thanks a lot!
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
