On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 13:05 +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Simon Wunderlich wrote: > > In the CSA case the BSS is still used, we modify the BSS entry in > > ieee80211_ibss_finish_csa() (which is not really clean, but done by all the > > current CSA code). > > > > Since the BSS is changed and the node continues to beacon, I think that's ok > > to do it like Sujith proposed. > > I think Johannes is right. If a station receives a CSA and is unable to switch > to the new channel, it leaves the IBSS network. In this case we don't need to > keep the BSS entry around, since we proceed to scan again. Hah, I wasn't paying attention ... yeah I think you're right, it's the *failure* case, in which we shouldn't care any more. Simon, you were thinking of the successful case, but that doesn't call disconnect ... johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
