Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC 2/4] cfg80211: rename function argument to be more readable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 16:26 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
> Unifies variable naming regarding radar detection
> width.

I think this is dangerous - "radar_detect_width" could easily be read as
an enum value, rather than a bitfield. I do wonder why
cfg80211_can_use_iftype_chan() gets passed a bitfield though, it might
be smarter to make that get an enum value for added type checking.
Actually I guess the reason is that there's no "no radar checking" value
in the enum then ...

At least for _widths, it's clear that it must be a bitfield since
otherwise more than one width wouldn't be possible.

> -		if (radar_detect && !(c->radar_detect_widths & radar_detect))
> +		if (radar_detect_width && !(c->radar_detect_widths & radar_detect_width))

That also makes it extend far beyond 80 columns.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux