On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 10:56 -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Johannes Berg
> > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 10:23 -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
> >>> > This isn't really true like I said above - the kernel can only drop the
> >>> > association, if userspace *insists* then it will try again and again.
> >>>
> >>> But it's not doing this:
> >>>
> >>> ieee80211_destroy_assoc_data(sdata, false);
> >>> cfg80211_assoc_timeout(sdata->dev, bss);
> >>>
> >>> Which is what causes the association to stop for me.
> >>>
> >>> So where exactly in the code is the association being "dropped"?
> >>
> >> This does get called in my setup.
> >
> > Yes, because your setup is receiving beacons.
> >
> > Check the code:
> >
> > if ((ifmgd->assoc_data->need_beacon && !ifmgd->have_beacon) ||
> > ieee80211_do_assoc(sdata)) {
> > struct cfg80211_bss *bss = ifmgd->assoc_data->bss;
> >
> > ieee80211_destroy_assoc_data(sdata, false);
> > cfg80211_assoc_timeout(sdata->dev, bss);
> > }
> >
> > If there's no beacon, cfg80211_assoc_timeout() is not called.
> >
> > I'm sure if you don't call ieee80211_rx_mgmt_beacon() at all you will
> > see the same behavior I see.
>
> My bad, actually the code that is not being called is:
>
> cfg80211_unlink_bss(local->hw.wiphy, assoc_data->bss);
>
> In ieee80211_do_assoc().
That's not really interesting though, it just deletes the scan entry. If
it was deleted, then the supplicant would just scan again and probably
retry the connection.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
