On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 14:41 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > @@ -1150,7 +1149,14 @@ static irqreturn_t iwl_pcie_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > * or due to sporadic interrupts thrown from our NIC. */
> > if (!inta) {
> > IWL_DEBUG_ISR(trans, "Ignore interrupt, inta == 0\n");
> > - goto none;
> > + /* re-enable interrupts here since we don't have anything to
> > + * service. only Re-enable if disabled by irq and no
> > + * schedules tasklet.
> > + */
> > + if (test_bit(STATUS_INT_ENABLED, &trans_pcie->status) &&
> > + !trans_pcie->inta)
> > + iwl_enable_interrupts(trans);
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
>
> I don't really think duplicating this is really an improvement?
Err, sorry, not paying attention.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
