On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Krishna Chaitanya >> <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Felipe Contreras >>> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> The authentication response does come back in both cases though, it's >>>> just the acknowledgement that is missing. Unfortunately I cannot >>>> figure out for which message it's the ack. >>>> >>>> Also, I notice the sequence number received from the router doesn't >>>> seem to change. All the authentication requests received have the same >>>> number (256). Another peculiar thing is that in the failed case the SN >>>> we send starts with 0. >>>> >>>> I suppose since the authentication ack never arrives, the next steps >>>> are never completed. >>>> >>>> Does that help? >>> From the supplicant logs we have successfully received the >>> authentication response >>> and sent out the association request. So are you referring to not receiving ACK >>> for association request?? >> >> No, from the capture there's no association request in the bad case, >> only in the good one. >> >>> It would be nice to get the capture without any filters? >> >> http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/wpa/wpa-bad.pcapng >> http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/wpa/wpa-good.pcapng >> > > From the logs we can see that we have received authentication response, > so the association request is getting dropped somewhere? We might > need the mac80211 and iwlwifi trace-cmd logs to check for the drop. > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Documentation/mac80211/tracing There you go: http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/wpa/trace.dat.xz -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
