On Friday, February 15, 2008 1:13 PM, Richard Scherping wrote: > Chatre, Reinette schrieb: >>>> One more question ... did ad-hoc work for you before this patch? >>> No. In my tests only ipw3945 works in Ad-Hoc mode. >> >> ok - that explains things. The patch assumes that ad-hoc mode is >> working, which is unfortunately not the case. We have to fix this. >> >> Reinette > > As I said, I have tested with iwl4965 only. Seems as if there > are more problems with ad-hoc and iwl3945. I understand. Thanks for your testing. There indeed appears to be more problems with ad-hoc and iwl3945, but they are unrelated to the patch that you tested. > Did ad-hoc work in the "old" iwl3945 (before the API change > with old version 1.1.17, compared to new version 1.2.23/26)? This needs to be checked. We do have some bug reports about ad-hoc mode in iwl3945 (see http://www.bughost.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1472). In this case it was specific to ad-hoc mode in b mode. We will look more into ad-hoc mode with iwl3945. Reinette - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
