"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I disagree. The point of linux-stable is _not_ that we send all possible >> fixes to stable. Instead we should send fixes only which really matter >> to users and for which we have received bug reports. I haven't yet seen >> any fix for ath10k which should be a candidate for stable releases. > > You don't need to wait for an issue to happen to consider it serious, > the description of the symptoms seem pretty bad to me, but its your > call in the end. > >> If we start sending all ath10k fixes to stable it's just extra churn for >> both Greg and people working on ath10k. > > I'm not asking for anything that has the word "fix" to be sent, I'm > asking them to be reviewed for stable consideration. I think a good rule is that we should send fixes to stable only if a user (!= developer) has reported the problem. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
