"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ath10k: fix issues on non-preemptible systems > > This patch looks like a stable candidate fix. Please annotate as such > if you confirm. Also, I reviewed other ath10k "fixes" and I see no > practice of propagating any patches to stable yet. Can you please > start doing that? If there were patches which are already merged > upstream that should be propagated to stable then they can be > submitted as stable candidate patches. I disagree. The point of linux-stable is _not_ that we send all possible fixes to stable. Instead we should send fixes only which really matter to users and for which we have received bug reports. I haven't yet seen any fix for ath10k which should be a candidate for stable releases. If we start sending all ath10k fixes to stable it's just extra churn for both Greg and people working on ath10k. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
