On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:42:39AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > On 26 August 2013 22:20, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ath10k: fix issues on non-preemptible systems > > > > This patch looks like a stable candidate fix. Please annotate as such > > if you confirm. Also, I reviewed other ath10k "fixes" and I see no > > practice of propagating any patches to stable yet. Can you please > > start doing that? If there were patches which are already merged > > upstream that should be propagated to stable then they can be > > submitted as stable candidate patches. > > Good point. > > If this patch is to be propagated to stable the patch(set) needs some > adjustments to avoid conflicts. Right now the patch touches a place > that was introduced with "ath10k: move htt rx processing to worker" so > the offending patch hunk should be moved to that patch. > > Actually the "ath10k: make the workqueue multithreaded" could also be > a candidate for stable as it fixes AP beaconing during heavy TX > traffic. I should've mentioned that in the commit log. > > I'll resend an updated patchset later today. That one doesn't seem like a stable fix, it does quite a big change. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
