On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Vladimir Kondratiev <qca_vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, July 22, 2013 09:17:01 AM Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:06:31AM +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: >> > Hmm, I have no warning for this with neither 3.10 nor 3.11 kernel version; but >> > patch is correct, and here is my >> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <qca_vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> If you agree with a patch you don't say you Sign-off-by it as well, >> you say Acked-by. The Signed-off-by tag has a very specific meaning >> from development to a maintainer's hands, and its definition is on >> the Developer Certificate or Origin. >> >> So in this case Acked-by is better. >> >> Luis > > <drop most of CC> > > I thought that I need to add Signed-off-by: as driver's maintainer, because > (quote Documentation/SubmittingPatches): > --- > The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the > development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. > --- > > This is similar to other maintainers adding its Signed-off-by:. > Or, is driver's maintainer an exception from the rule quoted above? If you had a git tree, sure, otherwise not in this case. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
