On Feb 4, 2008 1:14 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > No I won't we add rate flags which are part of spec anyway and then > > plcp rate it self will be in bitrate. > > > IEEE80211_RATE_HT_GF = 1<<5, /* green field */ > > IEEE80211_RATE_HT_SGI = 1<<5, /* short guarding interval */ > > IEEE80211_RATE_HT_FAT = 1<<6, /* 40Mhz Channel */ > > IEEE80211_RATE_HT_SISO = 1<<7, > > IEEE80211_RATE_HT_MIMO = 1<<8, > > IEEE80211_RATE_ANT_A = 1<<8, /* Number of antenna - no > > radio goes over 3 so 4 will be enough */ > > IEEE80211_RATE_ANT_B = 1<<8, > > IEEE80211_RATE_ANT_C = 1<<8, > > IEEE80211_RATE_ANT_D = 1<<8, > > Ah, I see. Since these flags aren't really rate specific, so shouldn't > they rather be part of the TX control, TX status and RX status directly > rather than inside the rate? The flags within the bitrate are meant to > indicate hardware capabilities and/or spec flags (like ERP) not control > flags like these are. No, they are rate specific the are not modulation specific, each of them can change from packet to packet. Thanks Tomas > johannes > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
