On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 17:50 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > Hmm, if this [1] is the official standard, then no, it is not defined. Don't > know when this was added in wireshark, and it was only added implicitly in > the code (no header files etc). But since it was there, I figured it would > be a good idea to re-use it (unaware that there was some "standard"). > > How shall we proceed, propose that on some radiotap mailing list officially? Yes, see http://www.radiotap.org/Standardisation > > > + RX_FLAG_10MHZ = BIT(26), > > > + RX_FLAG_5MHZ = BIT(27), > > > > Does that make sense? We know what kind of channel we're on? Though it > > might be easier for the driver, so it may make sense I guess. > > Yeah, it's a little easier for the driver, and I thought it would be > cleaner to get this reported through a flag. Yeah I tend to agree. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
