On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:27:06PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:00 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > > > Wireshark > > doesn't really matter all that much, but I guess the radiotap standard > also defines it. > Hmm, if this [1] is the official standard, then no, it is not defined. Don't know when this was added in wireshark, and it was only added implicitly in the code (no header files etc). But since it was there, I figured it would be a good idea to re-use it (unaware that there was some "standard"). How shall we proceed, propose that on some radiotap mailing list officially? > > > + RX_FLAG_10MHZ = BIT(26), > > + RX_FLAG_5MHZ = BIT(27), > > Does that make sense? We know what kind of channel we're on? Though it > might be easier for the driver, so it may make sense I guess. Yeah, it's a little easier for the driver, and I thought it would be cleaner to get this reported through a flag. Cheers, Simon [1] http://www.radiotap.org/defined-fields/Channel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
