On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi John, > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:22:38PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > Given recent events, I'm not sure that this is really acceptable as > > a fix request. The service bit and endianness in particular don't > > sound like they are addressing big problems, and the other two don't > > sound like they are really fixing any regressions either. > > > > Can these wait for 3.11? > I guess so, although they really are fixes. I don't doubt that they are fixes, but I think that Dave is trying to clamp down to only 'important' fixes -- data loss, crashes, etc. > I'll queue them in nfc-next and will send you a pull request. > Btw, are you going to merge wireless into wireless-next soon ? I merged the wireless tree into wireless-next yesterday. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
