On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:44:45PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:42:36AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:49:47AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:11:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > > > > > > > "I'm confirming that we got the space you needed for the Wireless Summit in > > > > > New Orleans. > > > > > > > > > Does that sound alright to everyone? > > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. If it overlaps LPC, which one are people going to > > > > have to register for (if not going to both anyway)? > > > > > > I would presume that if you want to got to LPC sessions then you > > > would have to register for LPC. Generally we have required Wireless > > > Summit attendees to register for LinuxCon, and I presume that would > > > be required this time (so both LinuxCon and LPC if you want the > > > LPC sessions). > > > > Why require LinuxCon registration rather than LPC? I'd assume most > > wireless summit attendees are more interested in plumbers than LinuxCon. > > Could the summit just require registration at one or the other? > > Well, I can ask. But the fact is that LPC and LCNA are separate > events with separate events with separate budgets and expenses, > separate organizers, etc. > > Anyway, I'll let you know what the event folks say... It's not really a big deal for me, I just thought it a bit odd since the audiences for wireless summit and LPC probably have more overlap. The reasons you and Marcel gave make sense. Thanks, Seth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
