On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I attached all the data you needed. >>> The link state seems to go to L1 based on the low power the NIC consumes. >>> So it seems that even if we use pci_disable_link_state() to disabled >>> L1, L1 is still disabled. >>> >> >> Ugh... so doesn't make any sense.... so again: >> >> So it seems that even if we use pci_disable_link_state() to disable >> L1, the link state still enters L1. > > ping? :-) Sorry, I haven't had a chance to look at this yet. Can you please attach the *complete* dmesg and lspci output, not just the parts that mention iwlwifi? Some of this depends on other PCI core stuff, like what happened with the _OSC evaluation when we discovered the PCI host bridge. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
