On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 13:03 -0700, Alex Romosan wrote: > > Could you try this patch? > > > > http://p.sipsolutions.net/617a8667db243e11.txt > > with this patch applied i can take the network down and bring it back > again. this is the log: > [ 84.440148] wlan0: send auth to xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1/3) > [ 84.442819] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim [Q 0] 0 -> 1 (1) > [ 84.442844] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx TXQ 0 status PASSIVE_NO_RX (0x00000090) rate_n_flags 0x800d retries 0 > [ 84.442855] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx FrameCnt = 1, idx=0 > [ 84.442884] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx TXQ 0 status PASSIVE_NO_RX (0x00000090) > [ 84.442896] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx initial_rate 0x800d retries 0, idx=0 ssn=1 seq_ctl=0x90 > [ 84.532849] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim [Q 0] 1 -> 2 (2) > [ 84.532867] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx TXQ 0 status SUCCESS (0x00000201) > [ 84.532875] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx initial_rate 0x400d retries 0, idx=1 ssn=2 seq_ctl=0x0 Ah so it's even the same packet because we set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_TX_FILTERED. Note the delay here -- roughly between 84.4428 and 84.5328 we wait for a beacon. I'll apply the patch and add your tested-by, like this: http://p.sipsolutions.net/7e871bfb5a0b272a.txt OK? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
