On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:21:48PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > So why remove > a sanity check that tells you about bugs in other drivers where it does > matter (because they are used on such weird architectures), just because one > vendor says "hey, doesn't matter for me"? This is a good point. If people were already using a driver on an oddball architecture, then we would get _those_ warnings (as we did when someone plugged a zd1211 device into their sparc box). The point of the warning is/was to point-out the problem to developers running on mainstream architecutres so that they could fix these problems rather than foisting them on some poor schmuck years from now trying to build an SPARC-based AP. (Hey, it could happen...) John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
