Hi Hauke,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do not implement this in b43, but use bcma_pmu_spuravoid_pllupdate().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 92 ++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
> index 3c35382..4130c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
> @@ -5220,19 +5150,33 @@ static void b43_nphy_channel_setup(struct b43_wldev *dev,
>
> if (dev->phy.rev >= 3 &&
> dev->phy.n->spur_avoid != B43_SPUR_AVOID_DISABLE) {
> - bool avoid = false;
> + struct bcma_drv_cc __maybe_unused *cc;
Could this go inside the #ifdef in the switch statement - that way the
__maybe_unused should be unnecessary?
> + int avoid = 0;
I though that bools were converted to ints exactly as you've converted
the avoid variable here.
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
