On 03/19/2013 09:18 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 23:09 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 03/18/2013 11:02 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 03/18/2013 09:03 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 20:47 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Hi Johannes,
While testing David Spinadel's P2P device support functionality I got
the following blurb, which is probably caused by cfg80211 tracing given
the instruction pointer address.
brcmfmac returns ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) and I think the trace code/macros do
not take this into account.
I guess this should fix it?
http://p.sipsolutions.net/fdea39f2a56aff67.txt
Did not test it, but that would be my guess to. Just another
observation: Is the wdev identifier not defined as u64?
Mind testing it? :-)
Left my test equipment at work. Just tested it and it works fine so:
Tested-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Found the answer. In nl80211 API the wdev identifier is 64 bits, which
got me confused.
Yes, externally it's a u64 but the high 32 bits are just the wiphy ID.
Makes it easier to look things up based on the wdev index :-)
Thanks,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
