On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 23:09 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 03/18/2013 11:02 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > On 03/18/2013 09:03 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 20:47 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >>> Hi Johannes, > >>> > >>> While testing David Spinadel's P2P device support functionality I got > >>> the following blurb, which is probably caused by cfg80211 tracing given > >>> the instruction pointer address. > >>> > >>> brcmfmac returns ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) and I think the trace code/macros do > >>> not take this into account. > >> > >> I guess this should fix it? > >> > >> http://p.sipsolutions.net/fdea39f2a56aff67.txt > > > > Did not test it, but that would be my guess to. Just another > > observation: Is the wdev identifier not defined as u64? Mind testing it? :-) > Found the answer. In nl80211 API the wdev identifier is 64 bits, which > got me confused. Yes, externally it's a u64 but the high 32 bits are just the wiphy ID. Makes it easier to look things up based on the wdev index :-) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
