hello johannes!
i appreciate your feedback, but on a second thought, let me question this:
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 23:48:49 Johannes Berg wrote:
> Comments on the code now.
>
> > --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c
> > @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_bss_put(struct net_device
> > *dev, struct ieee80211_sta_bss *bss); static int
> > ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(struct net_device *dev,
> > struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta);
> > +static int ieee80211_sta_join_ibss(struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta,
> > + struct ieee80211_sta_bss *bss);
>
> No way, order the code properly, this mess needs to be cleaned up not
> added to.
do you care to explain what's so bad about function declarations?
> > + if (sdata->vif.type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS && beacon &&
> > + !local->sta_sw_scanning && !local->sta_hw_scanning &&
> > + mgmt->u.beacon.capab_info & WLAN_CAPABILITY_IBSS &&
> > + memcmp(elems.ssid, sdata->u.sta.ssid, sdata->u.sta.ssid_len) == 0)
> > {
>
> I think that needs a check "&& ssid_len" or something. Someone's bound
> to try making an IBSS with a hidden SSID and we really don't want that
> to work.
why? i know, hidden SSIDs are pretty useless but if somedody wants them... why
would you want to make extra effort so it does not work?
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: beacon TSF higher than local TSF"
> > + " -> IBSS merge with BSSID %s\n",
> > + dev->name, print_mac(mac, mgmt->bssid));
>
> No way. At the very least you need to ratelimit this.
well, it should not happen very often, and for debugging i would like to see
this case. would
if (CONFIG_MAC80211_IBSS_DEBUG || net_ratelimit())
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: beacon TSF higher than "
be ok with you?
regards,
bruno
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
