On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:19 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 15:33 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > >> > For VHT, the wider bandwidths (up to 160 MHz) need > >> > to be allowed. Since world roaming only covers the > >> > case of connecting to an AP, it can be opened up > >> > there, we will rely on the AP to know the local > >> > regulations. > > > >> This seems reasonable to me but in your patch you only allow 80, not > >> 160, any reason for that? > > > > 160 doesn't fit here yet -- I think it should be enabled when/if those > > DFS channels are added, I don't see a reason they're missing there. > > True. OK I checked internally and enabling VHT80 is reasonable, as for > the DFS stuff you mentioned, you are right as well, but that should be > done through a separate patch. The only thing to consider there is > scan time increases considerably but seems like a reasonable > compromise. I'm surprised no one has had issues before with this. > > Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ok, applied the patch then. I'll send a patch for those DFS channels momentarily, care to take of db.txt? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
