On 03/04/2013 11:23 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 06:54:34PM +0100, Marco Porsch wrote:
Configure the device for PS mode if the local mesh PS parameters
allow so and the driver supports it.
Add two callbacks to ieee80211_ops for mesh powersave:
- mesh_ps_doze - put the device to sleep now, wake up at given
TBTT
- mesh_ps_wakeup - wake the device up now for frame RX
These ops may be extended in the future to allow drivers/HW to
implement mesh PS themselves. (Current design goal was to
concentrate most mesh PS routines in mac80211 to keep driver
modifications minimal.)
Track beacon timing information of peers we are in PS mode
towards. Calculate the next TBTT per STA. Stay awake to receive
multicast traffic after DTIM beacons.
When going to doze state, get the most imminent STA TBTT and
configure the device to trigger a wakeup on time to catch that
beacon. After successful receipt put the device to doze again.
Set a timeout for the case that the beacon is not received on
time. In this case calculate the following TBTT and go to doze
again.
For mesh Awake Windows wakeup on PreTBTT/SWBA (beacon_get_tim)
and start a timer which triggers a doze call on expiry.
Similarly, stay awake for the Awake Window duration after
sending probe response frames.
Signed-off-by: Marco Porsch <marco@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I've been looking at power save in mac80211 over the past few days with
an eye towards allowing multiple interface to be supported, as a result
of comments Johannes made at [1]. It seems like adding driver callbacks
for PS which are specific to the interface type is contrary to this
goal.
The basic idea that's been forming on my mind is add PS states to vifs
and make the managed, mesh, etc. code manipulate vif PS states rather
than hw states. Then a PS module would manage the hw state based on the
aggregate of the vif states.
I don't have a lot of the details worked out yet, and my knowledge of PS
in mesh networks (and of mesh network operation in general) is pretty
rudimentary at this point. But afaict any modes which support PS define
the same two hw states, awake and doze. I wonder whether we should
instead aim for a single interface into the driver for PS that's capable
of supporting all interface types.
Anyway, I just wanted to throw this out for discussion.
I would love to see multi-vif (station) power-saving support happen. I'm low
on development cycles at the moment, but at the least we can do
some testing....
Thanks,
Ben
Thanks,
Seth
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/104064
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
