Hi Johannes,
> Also...
>
> > COMMAND(wowlan, enable, "[any] [disconnect] [magic-packet] [gtk-rekey-failure] [eap-identity-
> request]"
> > - " [4way-handshake] [rfkill-release] [patterns <pattern>*]",
> > + " [4way-handshake] [rfkill-release] [patterns [offset1] <pattern1> ...]",
> > NL80211_CMD_SET_WOWLAN, 0, CIB_PHY, handle_wowlan_enable,
> > "Enable WoWLAN with the given triggers.\n"
> > "Each pattern is given as a bytestring with '-' in places where any byte\n"
> > "may be present, e.g. 00:11:22:-:44 will match 00:11:22:33:44 and\n"
> > - "00:11:22:33:ff:44 etc.");
> > + "00:11:22:33:ff:44 etc.\n"
> > + "Use ':' for single byte pattern as well, e.g. 18 43: will match '43' "
> > + "after 18 bytes of offset in Rx packet.");
>
> Is there maybe a slightly more intuitive syntax? I'm not really worried
> about the break of pattern being just a single byte, but it seems to me
> something like <offset>+<pattern> or so would be easier to understand?
>
> iw wowlan enable disconnect patterns 14+88:8E
>
> It would also be more obviously wrong to an old iw version -- it would
> reject this, while it would accept "14 88:8E" as two patterns.
Thanks for your comments.
V3 takes care of this as well as the old kernels. Please check.
Thanks,
Bing
>
> johannes
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
