On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 15:37 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > > + .rate_init = rtl_rate_init, > > .tx_status = rtl_tx_status, > > .get_rate = rtl_get_rate, > > }; > > Shouldn't rate_control_rate_init() in net/mac80211/rate.h be changed to protect > against the oops? I don't see any value in the client driver having to provide a > dummy routine. The rtlwifi family of drivers use their own rate-control > mechanism, and get no rate-control info from mac80211. In this case, I see no value in them providing rate control operations at all, and they could just set IEEE80211_HW_HAS_RATE_CONTROL, no? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
