On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 08:05:59PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 12:10 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > Well, I think the way that will be simplest with the fewest code changes > > would be to use a tx control flag. Of course then we've gobbled up one > > of the last available flags. > > Let's do that anyway then. I still think we need to do the > PS/scan/offchannel thing I described in another mail anyway, so that'd > be a better interim step than changing all the prototypes... When I originally looked at using a tx control flag I didn't think that using IEEE80211_TX_CTL_TX_OFFCHAN would work, but now I'm not sure why. Is there any reason not to do this? Seth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
