On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 16:20 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > > > I'd considered trying to expand this to check whether or not the frame > > > > was acked -- in fact just today I captured a trace where the AP didn't > > > > ack the frame but the STA went off-channel anyway. I'm not sure how to > > > > implement that yet, and haven't found time to look into it. > > > > > > It means waiting for the TX status from the driver, which might not > > > really come with all drivers at all, making it somewhat tricky in > > > general. > > > > > > Anyway my point is that this doesn't really help all that much, and > > > patch 1 and 3 together is a lot of churn ... > > > > Fair enough. If you want I can drop those and resend 2 and 4, because > > they do fix real problems. > > Please. I'll quickly go over them for comments first. I was going to say > I can apply them but I don't think they'll compile :) Actually they look fine. I thought the purge queue thing was weird but it's necessary, just wasn't obvious to me right now. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
