> Well we need regulatory daemon of some sort for non-AP hosts. I was > considering throwing this as part of wpa_supplicant/hostapd code. I > guess we'll see. That'd be doable, but sort of leaves people who don't want to use wpa_supplicant out. I guess it's only a matter of time though until we require use of a supplicant daemon (userspace mlme and all that...) so I guess it doesn't matter whether we start requiring it now or later... > > I hope Luis will work on the last two items, and I personally want to > > handle only the first two items. All others on the list are up for > > grabs. > > ACK -- I will. Thanks! johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part