On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Question for the list ... >> >> Internally, we've identified patches to this new driver as >> >> "iwlwifi (MVM):" >> >> rather than just "iwlwifi:" >> >> We can continue doing so (and would probably also tag patches with >> "iwlwifi" for core and "iwlwifi (DVM)" for the DVM part. >> >> Would "iwlmvm"/"iwldvm"/"iwlwifi" make more sense as that's the module >> names? It's harder to filter though, I guess. > > I would use this: > > "iwlwifi: mvm: fix foo" > If two-items notation then "item1: item2: Subject" is better than the commata notation "iwlwifi, mwm: Fix foo" should simply die... More Like-it (mostly seen in media): [subtree|driver-family|etc.] special-driver|script|etc: Subject For example: "[kbuild] deb-pkg: Bump year in copyright (kbuild subtree and debbuild script (aka make deb-pkg). And yes, I like capital letter in the first word of subject (after ":"). Two items is OK. But more items seen for rtlwifi sth. like "rtlwifi: rtlX: rtlY: rtlZ: Here now what I wanted to fix" is IMHO bad for extracting patches with git. BTW, why do you need two items? Is there somewhere a mvm driver in another subtree? Or new buzz-word: What about "iwlmvm"? iwlegacy - iwlwifi - iwlmvm... - Sedat - > I don't remember where I saw that style first but I liked it. > > -- > Kalle Valo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
