hi johannes,
i agree on that count :)
thanks and regards
Vivek
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:40:05 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 02:39 -0800, vivekanandah@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
is'nt the station's capability and the AP capability intersected
during
association? i always thought that the comment was mis-represented.
i did a small test and i see that the stations capability is
actually
the subset of AP capabilities that both support.
if that is the case, then we do not have to check for the capability
independently there! do i miss something in my understanding?
also, if what i have stated above is correct, then yes, i feel
delayed
block ack as a feature might need to be implemented on mac80211 and
then
check for the same.
I don't see what difference that makes? You still have to implement
the
feature fully, we don't have support for it at all.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
