On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 02:39 -0800, vivekanandah@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > is'nt the station's capability and the AP capability intersected during > association? i always thought that the comment was mis-represented. > > i did a small test and i see that the stations capability is actually > the subset of AP capabilities that both support. > if that is the case, then we do not have to check for the capability > independently there! do i miss something in my understanding? > > also, if what i have stated above is correct, then yes, i feel delayed > block ack as a feature might need to be implemented on mac80211 and then > check for the same. I don't see what difference that makes? You still have to implement the feature fully, we don't have support for it at all. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
